🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.